The Knowledge-Society Relationship in Pareto and Sorokin

In view of the analogous nature of knowledge, all attempts at theoretical comparison and integration in any discipline must take account of each theorist's prime analogue. In sociology, this amounts to the individual's basic conception of the nature of society. Its significance lies in its...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McElroy, Jerome E. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: 1963
In: The American catholic sociological review
Year: 1963, Volume: 24, Issue: 4, Pages: 302-315
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In view of the analogous nature of knowledge, all attempts at theoretical comparison and integration in any discipline must take account of each theorist's prime analogue. In sociology, this amounts to the individual's basic conception of the nature of society. Its significance lies in its capacity to ultimately determine all relationships and conceptual meanings contained within a logically consistent theory. It implies the theorist's belief in the presence or absence of features which distinguish man from the rest of reality. Consequently, the relationship between knowledge and society appears to be that element which is most reflective of the analogue on which any societal theory rests. Using this relationship as a lens through which we examine the theories of Vilfredo Pareto and Pitirim Sorokin not only indicates basic differences between the two, but also leads us to certain conclusions concerning the adequacy of various prime analogues for the analysis of social phenomena.
ISSN:2325-7881
Contains:Enthalten in: The American catholic sociological review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/3708873