Al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī (d. 1325) and the Early Reception of Kātibī’s Shamsīya: Notes towards a Study of the Dynamics of Post-Avicennan Logical Commentary

Al-Risāla al-Shamsīya fī l-qawāʿid al-manṭiqīya by Najm al-Dīn al-Kātibī (d. 1277) is one of the most widely-read textbooks on logic ever written. Its first readers, however, were less enthusiastic about it than later generations proved to be. In the earliest commentary written on the Shamsīya, al-ʿ...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Street, Tony (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2016
In: Oriens
Year: 2016, Volume: 44, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 267-300
Further subjects:B post-Avicennan commentary
B Arabic reception of the Organon
B Arabic logic
B al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt
B Syllogistic
B Modal logic
B Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī
B al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī
B Najm al-Dīn al-Kātibī
B Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī
B al-Risāla al-Shamsīya
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1821437721
003 DE-627
005 20221116162851.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/18778372-04403004  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821437721 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821437721 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Street, Tony  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Street, Tony 
245 1 0 |a Al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī (d. 1325) and the Early Reception of Kātibī’s Shamsīya: Notes towards a Study of the Dynamics of Post-Avicennan Logical Commentary 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Al-Risāla al-Shamsīya fī l-qawāʿid al-manṭiqīya by Najm al-Dīn al-Kātibī (d. 1277) is one of the most widely-read textbooks on logic ever written. Its first readers, however, were less enthusiastic about it than later generations proved to be. In the earliest commentary written on the Shamsīya, al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī (d. 1325) expressed serious reservations about a number of Kātibī’s decisions, decisions which developed ideas first put forward by Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 1210). In the following article, I examine how the commentary Ḥillī wrote on the Shamsīya, al-Qawāʿid al-jalīya fī sharḥ al-Risāla al-Shamsīya, fits in with his other works on logic, and how it responds to Kātibī’s logical program in general and to the syllogistic in particular. When set against the preceding two centuries of commentary on Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, Ḥillī’s response to the Shamsīya—and indeed Kātibī’s writing of the Shamsīya itself—can be seen as seamlessly carrying forward a commentary tradition in which Rāzī and Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī (d. 1274) figure prominently. The first appendix to the article examines the transformation of a lemma in the Ishārāt into the corresponding lemma in the Shamsīya through 150 years of commentatorial debate; the second appendix presents translations of a number of texts on syllogistic from al-Qawāʿid al-jalīya. 
650 4 |a al-Risāla al-Shamsīya 
650 4 |a al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt 
650 4 |a Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī 
650 4 |a Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī 
650 4 |a al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī 
650 4 |a Najm al-Dīn al-Kātibī 
650 4 |a Arabic reception of the Organon 
650 4 |a post-Avicennan commentary 
650 4 |a Modal logic 
650 4 |a Arabic logic 
650 4 |a Syllogistic 
650 4 |a al-Risāla al-Shamsīya 
650 4 |a al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt 
650 4 |a Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī 
650 4 |a Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī 
650 4 |a al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī 
650 4 |a Najm al-Dīn al-Kātibī 
650 4 |a Arabic reception of the Organon 
650 4 |a post-Avicennan commentary 
650 4 |a Modal logic 
650 4 |a Arabic logic 
650 4 |a Syllogistic 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Oriens  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1948  |g 44(2016), 3/4, Seite 267-300  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)504272314  |w (DE-600)2213264-8  |w (DE-576)251711080  |x 1877-8372  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:2016  |g number:3/4  |g pages:267-300 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/44653836  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-04403004  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/orie/44/3-4/article-p267_3.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 44  |j 2016  |e 3/4  |h 267-300 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208241772 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821437721 
LOK |0 005 20221116162851 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-11-02#AA98E8F6C21C1227420CC9DE4FE25E9A8D943A5D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/44653836 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL