Some critical reflections on the hiddenness argument

J.L. Schellenberg’s Argument from Divine Hiddenness maintains that if a perfectly loving God exists, then there is no non-resistant non-belief. Given that such nonbelief exists, however, it follows that there is no perfectly loving God. To support the conditional claim, Schellenberg presents concept...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Aijaz, Imran (Author) ; Weidler, Markus (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2007
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2007, Volume: 61, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-23
Further subjects:B Belief
B Divine Hiddenness
B Vanstone
B Nonbelief
B Loving God
B Schellenberg
B Accommodationist strategy
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821422767
003 DE-627
005 20221110052745.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-006-9103-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821422767 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821422767 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Aijaz, Imran  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Aijaz, Imran 
245 1 0 |a Some critical reflections on the hiddenness argument 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a J.L. Schellenberg’s Argument from Divine Hiddenness maintains that if a perfectly loving God exists, then there is no non-resistant non-belief. Given that such nonbelief exists, however, it follows that there is no perfectly loving God. To support the conditional claim, Schellenberg presents conceptual and analogical considerations, which we subject to critical scrutiny. We also evaluate Schellenberg’s claim that the belief that God exists is logically necessary for entering into a relationship with the Divine. Finally, we turn to possible variants of Schellenberg’s case, and argue that the modifications necessary to accommodate our criticismas leave those variants with much less of a sting than originally suggested by his provocative formulation. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Accommodationist strategy 
650 4 |a Nonbelief 
650 4 |a Belief 
650 4 |a Loving God 
650 4 |a Divine Hiddenness 
650 4 |a Vanstone 
650 4 |a Schellenberg 
700 1 |a Weidler, Markus  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 61(2007), 1, Seite 1-23  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:61  |g year:2007  |g number:1  |g pages:1-23 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646896734  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646192  |x JSTOR 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11153-006-9103-8.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-006-9103-8  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 61  |j 2007  |e 1  |h 1-23 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208226773 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821422767 
LOK |0 005 20221110052745 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#DF4D583712D3AF384882AB57CC77E44EB09A9A01 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/27646192 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL