Are skeptical theists really skeptics? Sometimes yes and sometimes no

Skeptical theism is the view that God exists but, given our cognitive limitations, the fact that we cannot see a compensating good for some instance of evil is not a reason to think that there is no such good. Hence, we are not justified in concluding that any actual instance of evil is gratuitous,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McBrayer, Justin P. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2012
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2012, Volume: 72, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-16
Further subjects:B Contrastivism
B Atheism
B Interest-relative invariantism
B Skeptical theism
B Argument from evil
B Contextualism
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821418069
003 DE-627
005 20221110052731.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-011-9319-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821418069 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821418069 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a McBrayer, Justin P.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a McBrayer, Justin P.  |a MacBrayer, Justin P. 
245 1 0 |a Are skeptical theists really skeptics? Sometimes yes and sometimes no 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Skeptical theism is the view that God exists but, given our cognitive limitations, the fact that we cannot see a compensating good for some instance of evil is not a reason to think that there is no such good. Hence, we are not justified in concluding that any actual instance of evil is gratuitous, thus undercutting the evidential argument from evil for atheism. This paper focuses on the epistemic role of context and contrast classes to advance the debate over skeptical theism in two ways. First, considerations of context and contrast can be invoked to offer a novel defense of skeptical theism. Second, considerations of context and contrast can be invoked to undermine the two most serious objections to skeptical theism: the global skepticism objection and the moral objection. The gist of the paper is to defend a connection between context and contrast-driven views in epistemology with skeptical views in philosophy of religion. 
650 4 |a Argument from evil 
650 4 |a Contrastivism 
650 4 |a Interest-relative invariantism 
650 4 |a Contextualism 
650 4 |a Atheism 
650 4 |a Skeptical theism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 72(2012), 1, Seite 3-16  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:72  |g year:2012  |g number:1  |g pages:3-16 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646894944  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23258355  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-011-9319-0  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 72  |j 2012  |e 1  |h 3-16 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208222077 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821418069 
LOK |0 005 20221110052731 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#E55E01ABCF95EA3687E4E1E98AB2E305E9ECFFBF 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23258355 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL