Simply Unsuccessful: The Neo-Platonic Proof of God's Existence
Edward Feser defends the "Neo-Platonic proof" for the existence of the God of classical theism. After articulating the argument and a number of preliminaries, I first argue that premise three of Feser's argument - the causal principle that every composite object requires a sustainin...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
2021
|
| Dans: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Année: 2021, Volume: 13, Numéro: 4, Pages: 129-156 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Divine Simplicity
B Incarnation B Trinity B Neo-Platonic Proof B God |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Edward Feser defends the "Neo-Platonic proof" for the existence of the God of classical theism. After articulating the argument and a number of preliminaries, I first argue that premise three of Feser's argument - the causal principle that every composite object requires a sustaining efficient cause to combine its parts - is both unjustified and dialectically ill-situated. I then argue that the Neo-Platonic proof fails to deliver the mindedness of the absolutely simple being and instead militates against its mindedness. Finally, I uncover two tensions between Trinitarianism and the Neo-Platonic proof. |
|---|---|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.2021.3412 |