Worldview Literacy as Educational Praxis: A Response to ‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations’, Johannes C. Wolfart
This response picks up on two key themes identified by Wolfhart: that of the contested aims of “religious literacy” and the lack of an evidence base for its efficacy. Focusing on the context of formal schooling, the idea of “worldview literacy” is presented as an alternative to “religious literacy”....
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
2022
|
In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Jahr: 2022, Band: 34, Heft: 5, Seiten: 484-491 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Weltanschauung
/ Religionspädagogik
/ Interreligiöses Lernen
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Religionswissenschaft AH Religionspädagogik AX Interreligiöse Beziehungen |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Kommentar
B Religious Education B Praxis B worldview literacy B transformative education |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Zusammenfassung: | This response picks up on two key themes identified by Wolfhart: that of the contested aims of “religious literacy” and the lack of an evidence base for its efficacy. Focusing on the context of formal schooling, the idea of “worldview literacy” is presented as an alternative to “religious literacy”. Rather than an outcome of education, “worldview literacy” is presented as a process of encounter in plurality, an educational praxis that brings young people to a greater understanding of the dynamic diversity of worldviews and of themselves as social actors therein. This reconciles what are often seen as competing aims of Religious Education and provides a framework for a more distributed worldviews education. It is suggested that amidst a preoccupation with measurement, attention needs to be refocused on the value of the educational process itself. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
Bezug: | Kommentar zu "‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations (2022)"
|
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-bja10083 |