How Do You Solve a Problem Like ‘Religious Literacy’?: Thinking with Wolfart’s ‘Religious Literacy’ Reservations
Wolfart persuasively locates religious literacy advocacy within the reforming, salvific myth of literacies. However, instead of Wolfart’s identification of religious literacy as ex-theological, I argue that a narrowly defined religious literacy is theological and, therefore, Religious Studies facult...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2022
|
| Dans: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Année: 2022, Volume: 34, Numéro: 5, Pages: 446-452 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Savoir
/ Religion
/ Théologie
/ Pédagogie des religions
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AH Pédagogie religieuse FA Théologie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Johannes Wolfart
B Commentaire B Religious Literacy |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Wolfart persuasively locates religious literacy advocacy within the reforming, salvific myth of literacies. However, instead of Wolfart’s identification of religious literacy as ex-theological, I argue that a narrowly defined religious literacy is theological and, therefore, Religious Studies faculty should (re)negotiate what it means in relation to what we do as teachers. For this, Religious Studies faculty need to resist the civic soteriology and the seductive allure of claiming authority based on specialness or supposed distinctiveness of something called religious. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Référence: | Kommentar zu "‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations (2022)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-bja10077 |