New frontiers of religious freedom? LGBTQ rights versus religious conscience

One frontier of public deliberation on religious freedom involves the clash of religious conscience with government rules against discrimination. As American courts consider issues pitting religious believers against other groups, especially LGBTQ citizens, the public is deeply divided. A paradigmat...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Guth, James L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2022
In: Religion, state & society
Year: 2022, Volume: 50, Issue: 3, Pages: 338-355
Further subjects:B conscience exemptions
B LGBTQ rights
B ethnoreligious group
B Religious Liberty
B Culture Wars
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1816392138
003 DE-627
005 20220911033202.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220910s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09637494.2022.2088991  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1816392138 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1816392138 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1135920745  |0 (DE-627)890924732  |0 (DE-576)49015669X  |4 aut  |a Guth, James L. 
109 |a Guth, James L. 
245 1 0 |a New frontiers of religious freedom? LGBTQ rights versus religious conscience 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a One frontier of public deliberation on religious freedom involves the clash of religious conscience with government rules against discrimination. As American courts consider issues pitting religious believers against other groups, especially LGBTQ citizens, the public is deeply divided. A paradigmatic case has been the Masterpiece Cakeshop litigation, testing whether a Christian baker could refuse to produce a wedding cake for a same-sex couple given his religious objections. As that case continues and similar confrontations proliferate, the First Amendment’s ‘free exercise’ clause produces new dilemmas. Although public attitudes seldom influence judicial decisions directly, in the long run American courts may well ‘follow the election returns’. This contribution considers public assessments of the importance of religious liberty and then examines attitudes on the Masterpiece controversy, using data from the Democracy Fund’s Voter Survey and the 2016 and 2020 American National Election Studies (ANES). We find that religious factors play a major role in determining citizen opinion, as the public reacts very much along ‘culture wars’ lines. But personal attitudes toward LGBTQ citizens also have a major direct impact on views about ‘conscience exemptions’. 
601 |a Frontier 
650 4 |a LGBTQ rights 
650 4 |a ethnoreligious group 
650 4 |a Culture Wars 
650 4 |a conscience exemptions 
650 4 |a Religious Liberty 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religion, state & society  |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1992  |g 50(2022), 3, Seite 338-355  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270928073  |w (DE-600)1478007-0  |w (DE-576)097188581  |x 1465-3974  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:50  |g year:2022  |g number:3  |g pages:338-355 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2022.2088991  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09637494.2022.2088991  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 50  |j 2022  |e 3  |h 338-355 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4186492379 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1816392138 
LOK |0 005 20220910052551 
LOK |0 008 220910||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-09#E9971A2DC66E25EBC139A0400CA20E309D270D12 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL