A Qualification of Methodological Naturalism: Brightman and de Vries Revisited
In this study I analyze what Edgar Sheffield Brightman and Paul de Vries originally meant by methodological naturalism, when they first invented the term and then argue that both of them proposed a significantly qualified version of scientific naturalism over against the predominance of a reductioni...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
2022
|
| Dans: |
Theology and science
Année: 2022, Volume: 20, Numéro: 2, Pages: 166-178 |
| RelBib Classification: | VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Scientism
B Metaphysical naturalism B epistemic reductionism B Edgar Sheffield Brightman B Paul de Vries B Methodological Naturalism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | In this study I analyze what Edgar Sheffield Brightman and Paul de Vries originally meant by methodological naturalism, when they first invented the term and then argue that both of them proposed a significantly qualified version of scientific naturalism over against the predominance of a reductionist version of scientific naturalism called epistemic reductionism or scientism—that is, an unjustified epistemological assumption that science is the only legitimate way to truth. In the final analysis, I propose a qualified re-definition of methodological naturalism with emphasis on the self-restricted application of the naturalistic method to natural sciences alone. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2022.2051249 |