Sage and great person in Zhang Zai’s thought

The idea of the Confucian sage-king can be politically dangerous if the implication is that anyone can become a sage through learning. But Confucians after the Han dynasty generally saw the task of becoming a sage practically impossible, while Neo-Confucians after the Song distinguished between the...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Song, Yunwoo (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Carfax 2022
Dans: Asian philosophy
Année: 2022, Volume: 32, Numéro: 2, Pages: 189-200
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Zhang, Zai 1020-1077 / Sage / Souverain / Légitimation / Histoire 500 avant J.-C.-1100
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
AD Sociologie des religions
BM Religions chinoises
NCA Éthique
TB Antiquité
TE Moyen Âge
Sujets non-standardisés:B Moral authority
B great person
B Zhang Zai
B Political Authority
B sage-king
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:The idea of the Confucian sage-king can be politically dangerous if the implication is that anyone can become a sage through learning. But Confucians after the Han dynasty generally saw the task of becoming a sage practically impossible, while Neo-Confucians after the Song distinguished between the moral and the political authorities. Zhang Zai of the Northern Song dynasty, however, maintained both that anyone can become a sage through learning and that a sage should necessarily receive Heaven’s mandate. But Zhang had a unique concept of a ‘great person,’ which enabled him to escape the seemingly inevitable conclusion that anyone can become a king. For Zhang, a great person is practically indistinguishable from a sage, meaning that no one can testify to another person’s sagehood. This makes any claim to the political authority based on virtue groundless. Thus, despite preserving the ideal of a sage-king, Zhang Zai could deny virtually all means of replacing the current king.
ISSN:1469-2961
Contient:Enthalten in: Asian philosophy
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/09552367.2021.1983951