Sage and great person in Zhang Zai’s thought
The idea of the Confucian sage-king can be politically dangerous if the implication is that anyone can become a sage through learning. But Confucians after the Han dynasty generally saw the task of becoming a sage practically impossible, while Neo-Confucians after the Song distinguished between the...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Carfax
2022
|
Dans: |
Asian philosophy
Année: 2022, Volume: 32, Numéro: 2, Pages: 189-200 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Zhang, Zai 1020-1077
/ Sage
/ Souverain
/ Légitimation
/ Histoire 500 avant J.-C.-1100
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion AD Sociologie des religions BM Religions chinoises NCA Éthique TB Antiquité TE Moyen Âge |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Moral authority
B great person B Zhang Zai B Political Authority B sage-king |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | The idea of the Confucian sage-king can be politically dangerous if the implication is that anyone can become a sage through learning. But Confucians after the Han dynasty generally saw the task of becoming a sage practically impossible, while Neo-Confucians after the Song distinguished between the moral and the political authorities. Zhang Zai of the Northern Song dynasty, however, maintained both that anyone can become a sage through learning and that a sage should necessarily receive Heaven’s mandate. But Zhang had a unique concept of a ‘great person,’ which enabled him to escape the seemingly inevitable conclusion that anyone can become a king. For Zhang, a great person is practically indistinguishable from a sage, meaning that no one can testify to another person’s sagehood. This makes any claim to the political authority based on virtue groundless. Thus, despite preserving the ideal of a sage-king, Zhang Zai could deny virtually all means of replacing the current king. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-2961 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Asian philosophy
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09552367.2021.1983951 |