Ambedkar’s Dhamma: A Counter-theology of Law for Indian Political Thought
This paper will argue that B.R. Ambedkar attacked the social law of Hindu dharma for legalizing and legitimizing Brahminical sovereignty in the form of a birth-based caste order centred around the ambivalent sacrality of untouchability. Although Ambedkar inaugurated postcolonial India’s transformati...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
2022
|
| In: |
Political theology
Jahr: 2022, Band: 23, Heft: 1/2, Seiten: 59-74 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Ambedkar, Bhimrao Ramji 1891-1956
/ Hinduismus
/ Buddhismus
/ Kaste
/ Souveränität
/ Recht
/ Theologie
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Religionssoziologie; Religionspolitik BK Hinduismus, Jainismus, Sikhismus BL Buddhismus FD Kontextuelle Theologie KBM Asien TK Neueste Zeit XA Recht |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Sovereignty
B untouchability B Law B Buddhism B Fraternity B Caste B Ambedkar B Constitution |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1796007358 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220507105106.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220318s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/1462317X.2021.2014033 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1796007358 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1796007358 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tundawala, Moiz |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ambedkar’s Dhamma: A Counter-theology of Law for Indian Political Thought |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper will argue that B.R. Ambedkar attacked the social law of Hindu dharma for legalizing and legitimizing Brahminical sovereignty in the form of a birth-based caste order centred around the ambivalent sacrality of untouchability. Although Ambedkar inaugurated postcolonial India’s transformative constitutional project, its juridical language of secular legality was not powerful enough an antidote against the social customs of caste and untouchability. Since these practices were ultimately grounded in a Hindu theology imputing responsibility for action to a fixed immutable being, Ambedkar sought to unsettle and destabilize it by proffering a counter-theology of Buddhism that delinked action from any substantial being, and thereby opened up sovereignty as an empty place of political power. His Buddhism though, was less a religion of selfless renunciation, and more a religion of rupture mediated by the political law of fraternal freedom, actualized in the excessive subjectivity of the Dalit community of converted Buddhists. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Caste | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fraternity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a untouchability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sovereignty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitution | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Buddhism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ambedkar | |
| 652 | |a AD:BK:BL:FD:KBM:TK:XA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)119165473 |0 (DE-627)079960901 |0 (DE-576)211444413 |2 gnd |a Ambedkar, Bhimrao Ramji |d 1891-1956 |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4024955-4 |0 (DE-627)106295438 |0 (DE-576)208958487 |2 gnd |a Hinduismus |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4008690-2 |0 (DE-627)106366823 |0 (DE-576)20887772X |2 gnd |a Buddhismus |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4163401-9 |0 (DE-627)105455105 |0 (DE-576)209880775 |2 gnd |a Kaste |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4132367-1 |0 (DE-627)105688258 |0 (DE-576)209634960 |2 gnd |a Souveränität |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |0 (DE-627)106189719 |0 (DE-576)20907907X |2 gnd |a Recht |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059758-1 |0 (DE-627)104131446 |0 (DE-576)209132159 |2 gnd |a Theologie |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Political theology |d Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 1999 |g 23(2022), 1/2, Seite 59-74 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341910279 |w (DE-600)2070811-7 |w (DE-576)25998390X |x 1743-1719 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2022 |g number:1/2 |g pages:59-74 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.2014033 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 23 |j 2022 |e 1/2 |h 59-74 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4095009837 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1796007358 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220507105106 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220318||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-03-17#4B6BF6A65C1D5059AA0E8D79C7DFCFA846317816 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144204893X |a KBM | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043571 |a BK | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043644 |a BL | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053798 |a XA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044071 |a FD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053887 |a TK | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Buddhism,Buddhism,Caste,Hinduism,Hinduism,Law,Law,Right,Law,Jurisprudence,Law in literature,Sovereignty,Sovereignty,National sovereignty,State sovereignty,Theology,Theology |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Buddhisme,Bouddhisme,Caste,Droit,Droit,Hindouisme,Hindouisme,Souveraineté,Souveraineté,Théologie,Théologie |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Budismo,Budismo,Casta,Derecho,Derecho,Hinduismo,Hinduismo,Soberanía,Soberanía,Teología,Teología |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Buddhismo <motivo>,Buddhismo,Buddismo,Buddismo,Buddismo (motivo),Buddismo,Casta,Diritto,Diritto,Induismo,Induismo,Sovranità,Sovranità,Teologia,Teologia |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 主权,统治权,佛教,印度教,法律,法律,法制,法制,神学家,种姓制度,社会等级制度 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 主權,統治權,佛教,印度教,法律,法律,法制,法制,神學家,種姓制度,社會等級制度 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Budismo,Budismo,Casta,Direito,Direito,Hinduísmo,Hinduísmo,Soberania,Soberania,Teologia,Teologia |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Богословие (мотив),Богословие,Буддизм (мотив),Буддизм,Индуизм (мотив),Индуизм,Каста,Право (мотив),Право,Суверенитет (мотив),Суверенитет |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Βουδισμός (μοτίβο),Βουδισμός,Δίκαιο (μοτίβο),Δίκαιο,Θεολογία (μοτίβο),Θεολογία,Ινδουισμός (μοτίβο),Ινδουισμός,Κάστα,Κυριαρχία (μοτίβο),Κυριαρχία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Babasaheb,1891-1956,Ambedkar, Bhivram Ramji,1891-1956,Ambedkar, B. R.,1891-1956,Āmbeḍakara, Bhīmārava Rāmarava,1891-1956,Āmbeḍakara, Bābāsāheba,1891-1956,Ambedkar, Baba Saheb,1891-1956,Bābāsāheba,1891-1956,Āmbeḍakara, Bhīmarāva Rāmajī,1891-1956,Ambedkar, Bhimrao Ramschi,1891-1956,Ambedkar, Bhimrao Ramrao,1891-1956,Ambeḍkar, Bhīmarāu Rāmajī,1891-1956,Ambedkar, Babasaheb,1891-1956,Ambedkar, B. R.,1891-1956 , Hinduism,Brahmanismus,Vedic religion , Buddhism,Zen-Buddhismus , Kasten,Kastensystem,Kastenwesen , Völkerrecht - Souveränität,Nationale Souveränität,Staatssouveränität,Staat,Staatliche Souveränität , Christliche Theologie |