"Sagehood" in Confucianism and the "Universal Call to Holiness" in Roman Catholicism
Confucian classics emphasize a harmonious, just and sage ruler. Neo-Confucian philosopher Wang Yangming is equanimous in his extending sagacity to all. In keeping with the Catholic Church's "universal call to holiness" in the Second Vatican Council, this article explores a dialogue be...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Peeters
2021
|
| Dans: |
Studies in interreligious dialogue
Année: 2021, Volume: 31, Numéro: 2, Pages: 117-127 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Confucianisme
/ Sagesse
/ Sainteté
/ Théologie catholique
/ Concile du Vatican 2. (1962-1965 : Vatikanstadt), Lumen gentium 39-42
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion AG Vie religieuse AX Dialogue interreligieux BM Religions chinoises CB Spiritualité chrétienne CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses KDB Église catholique romaine |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Confucian classics emphasize a harmonious, just and sage ruler. Neo-Confucian philosopher Wang Yangming is equanimous in his extending sagacity to all. In keeping with the Catholic Church's "universal call to holiness" in the Second Vatican Council, this article explores a dialogue between equanimous sagacity and the "universal call". With a brief account of the historical context of these two traditions, this article compares their ways to strive for sagacity and holiness, which are ultimately related to Confucian ren (benevolence or humaneness) and Christian love respectively. In the final section, we examine how these paths to sagehood and holiness are not mutually exclusive, but could be mutually enriching. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1783-1806 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Studies in interreligious dialogue
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/SID.31.2.3290055 |