Difference and negotiation from the borders: Islamic religious actors providing theological counternarratives for deradicalisation in Belgium

This contribution focuses on the specific Islamic authority figures that have been incorporated as ‘key figures’ in Belgian deradicalisation policies since 2015, in order to formulate a theological counter discourse. It asks firstly how these Muslim authority figures differentiate their position as...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Groeninck, Mieke (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge 2021
Dans: Religion, state & society
Année: 2021, Volume: 49, Numéro: 4/5, Pages: 331-349
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Belgien / Musulman / Radicalisation / Contremesure / Islamischer Theologe / Narration (Sciences sociales)
RelBib Classification:AD Sociologie des religions
BJ Islam
KBD Benelux
ZB Sociologie
ZC Politique en général
Sujets non-standardisés:B border thinking
B Deradicalisation
B Theological counternarrative
B Islamic authorities
B Secularism
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:This contribution focuses on the specific Islamic authority figures that have been incorporated as ‘key figures’ in Belgian deradicalisation policies since 2015, in order to formulate a theological counter discourse. It asks firstly how these Muslim authority figures differentiate their position as ‘non-state’ actors manoeuvring a space of negotiation in secular power structures. Secondly, the contribution reflects on how they negotiate what Talal Asad has called ‘the secular episteme’ in their formulation of a theological counternarrative, as well as on how this relates to processes of ethical self-making and ‘apt’ authority formation. Rather than considering them as docile agents of the secular sovereign state, the concept of ‘border thinking’ is used to value the inter- and intra-traditional situatedness from where they attempt to renegotiate the horizons of expectations subscribed in hegemonic secularism.
ISSN:1465-3974
Contient:Enthalten in: Religion, state & society
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2021.1996178