Synthetic Biology Ethics: A Deontological Assessment
In this article I discuss the ethics of synthetic biology from a broadly deontological perspective, evaluating its morality in terms of the integrity of nature, the dignity of life and the relationship between God and his creation. Most ethical analyses to date have been largely consequentialist in...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2013
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2013, Volume: 27, Issue: 8, Pages: 442-452 |
| Further subjects: | B
synthetic biology and religion
B Synthetic Biology B dignity of life B dignity of nature B synthetic biology ethics B dual use biotechnology B playing God |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1781884846 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230125114809.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211211s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12052 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1781884846 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1781884846 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Heavey, Patrick |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Synthetic Biology Ethics: A Deontological Assessment |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this article I discuss the ethics of synthetic biology from a broadly deontological perspective, evaluating its morality in terms of the integrity of nature, the dignity of life and the relationship between God and his creation. Most ethical analyses to date have been largely consequentialist in nature; they reveal a dual use dilemma, showing that synbio has potential for great good and great evil, possibly more so than any step humanity has taken before. A deontological analysis may help to resolve this dilemma, by evaluating whether synbio is right or wrong in itself. I also assess whether deontology alone is a sufficient methodological paradigm for the proper evaluation of synbio ethics. | ||
| 601 | |a Deontologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a dual use biotechnology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a synthetic biology and religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a playing God | |
| 650 | 4 | |a dignity of nature | |
| 650 | 4 | |a dignity of life | |
| 650 | 4 | |a synthetic biology ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Synthetic Biology | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 27(2013), 8, Seite 442-452 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2013 |g number:8 |g pages:442-452 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12052 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12052 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 27 |j 2013 |e 8 |h 442-452 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4019007829 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1781884846 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211211042820 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211211||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-10#C95A3EC618F12C1652AE4C728485AFC9380AF9EB | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||