From Murphy's Christian Physicalism to Lowe's Dualism

Nancey Murphy argues that God created us as physical beings without immortal souls. She supports this Christian physicalism by arguing that neuroscience can better explain minds in terms of physical information processing than dualists can in problematic nonphysical terms. We reply that Murphy overe...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Jones, Mostyn (Auteur) ; LaRock, Eric (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain 2021
Dans: TheoLogica
Année: 2021, Volume: 5, Numéro: 2, Pages: 100-128
RelBib Classification:CF Christianisme et science
KAJ Époque contemporaine
NBE Anthropologie
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B E. J. Lowe
B Christian Physicalism
B Non-Cartesian substance dualism
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:Nancey Murphy argues that God created us as physical beings without immortal souls. She supports this Christian physicalism by arguing that neuroscience can better explain minds in terms of physical information processing than dualists can in problematic nonphysical terms. We reply that Murphy overestimates neuroscience and underestimates dualism. She doesn't show how neuroscience can explain the mind's characteristic qualia, unity, privacy, or causality. We argue that Lowe’s dualism can better explain minds, often with experimental support and in testable ways. Murphy's physicalism thus serves to highlight the value of Lowe's dualism today.
ISSN:2593-0265
Contient:Enthalten in: TheoLogica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.14428/thl.v5i2.56273