Hybridity and Reading Romans 13
Interpreters of Paul have made substantial progress in identifying anti- or counter-imperial strands in the writings of the apostle. In many cases, postcolonial theory has been an important resource for such interpretations. It has emphasized the imperial (or colonial) character of Roman rule and pr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2008
|
| In: |
Journal for the study of the New Testament
Year: 2008, Volume: 31, Issue: 2, Pages: 157-178 |
| Further subjects: | B
Resistance
B Colonialism B Roman Empire B Postcolonialism B Homi Bhabha B Hybridity |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1776993837 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20221219180422.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211110s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0142064X08098279 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1776993837 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1776993837 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Marshall, John W. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Hybridity and Reading Romans 13 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Interpreters of Paul have made substantial progress in identifying anti- or counter-imperial strands in the writings of the apostle. In many cases, postcolonial theory has been an important resource for such interpretations. It has emphasized the imperial (or colonial) character of Roman rule and provided avenues of analysis of resistant action and discourse that are well grounded in theoretical and comparative context. Postcolonialism, however, does more than identify and valorize resistance; it also attends to the discourses of affiliation that colonial subjects so often generate. Homi Bhabha's articulation of `hybridity' as a rubric under which to understand the relationship between resistant and affiliative responses by colonial subjects enables a deeper understanding of Paul specifically in that area that the politically engaged readings of Paul have made even more enigmatic, namely the relationship of the affiliative Rom. 13.1-7 to the apostle's evidently resistant discourse elsewhere in his literary corpus. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Roman Empire | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Resistance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Postcolonialism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hybridity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Homi Bhabha | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Colonialism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal for the study of the New Testament |d London : Sage, 1978 |g 31(2008), 2, Seite 157-178 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341347906 |w (DE-600)2067510-0 |w (DE-576)099025957 |x 1745-5294 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2008 |g number:2 |g pages:157-178 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1647013046 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X08098279 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo |a BIIN | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 31 |j 2008 |e 2 |h 157-178 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4000901060 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1776993837 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211110045741 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-08-06#0A7FBB772B3A4A4489F15EAB45EDBE668213FA68 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a BIB |a REL | ||