Radical plurality on universal grounds
This paper focuses on recent debates between the proponents of individualism and communitarianism. As the authors argue, the dichotomous character of these debates is inherently problematic, as no one functions just as an individual or member. Starting from the discussion around the Netflix series &...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2021
|
| Dans: |
Dialog
Année: 2021, Volume: 60, Numéro: 2, Pages: 177-184 |
| RelBib Classification: | KAJ Époque contemporaine KBE Scandinavie NBD Création NBE Anthropologie ZG Sociologie des médias; médias numériques; Sciences de l'information et de la communication |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Communitarianism
B radical plurality B Plurality B K.E. Løgstrup B Individualism B Interdependence B unorthodox |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This paper focuses on recent debates between the proponents of individualism and communitarianism. As the authors argue, the dichotomous character of these debates is inherently problematic, as no one functions just as an individual or member. Starting from the discussion around the Netflix series 'Unorthodox' in the Swedish context, the authors engage with Sharon Todd's radical conception of plurality, and K.E. Løgstrup's notions of interdependence and the resulting ethical demand to show how these debates could be reframed into the constructive tension between plurality and universality. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1540-6385 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Dialog
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/dial.12679 |