Response to Christopher Insole’s Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)

This is a response given at the book launch for Christopher Insole’s Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), hosted jointly, in November 2020, by the Centre for Catholic Studies, Durham University, and the Australian Catholic University. The...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adams, Nicholas 1970- (Author)
Contributors: Insole, Christopher J. (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2021
In: Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 34, Issue: 3, Pages: 293-297
Review of:Kant and the Divine (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2020) (Adams, Nicholas)
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
TJ Modern history
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Theology
B Book review
B Divine
B Reception
B Christianity
B Divinity
B Kant
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This is a response given at the book launch for Christopher Insole’s Kant and the Divine: From Contemplation to the Moral Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), hosted jointly, in November 2020, by the Centre for Catholic Studies, Durham University, and the Australian Catholic University. The response considers the gap between the textual Kant (as set out by Insole), and the received Kant, and reflects on how theologians have been too quick either to condemn and dismiss (a poorly interpreted) Kant, or to rehabilitate Kant for theological projects, which Kant would have been opposed to, given his deepest philosophical commitments.
ISSN:0953-9468
Reference:Kritik in "Author’s Reflections on the Responses and Questions from the Book Launch (2021)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/09539468211009762