Martin Buber, Empathy and Research Practice$aA Response to Rachel Cope
Researching religion and spirituality raises issues about the position of the researcher and the relationship between researcher and researched. These can be explored using Martin Buber’s idea of dialogue involving Realphantasie, ‘imagining the real’. Dialogue requires a strong form of empathy, whic...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2013
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the Study of Spirituality
Année: 2013, Volume: 3, Numéro: 1, Pages: 67-72 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Dialogue
B Imagination B Sympathy B Empathy B Martin Buber |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Researching religion and spirituality raises issues about the position of the researcher and the relationship between researcher and researched. These can be explored using Martin Buber’s idea of dialogue involving Realphantasie, ‘imagining the real’. Dialogue requires a strong form of empathy, which can take place notwithstanding profound disagreement, whereas a more dialectical progress to agreement is more associated with sympathy, feeling another person’s feelings. Sympathy cannot be required of researchers, but empathy, as described by Buber, is a reasonable expectation of us all. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2044-0251 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the Study of Spirituality
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1179/2044024313Z.0000000006 |