The Qumran Pesharim and Targum Jonathan to the Prophets: Rethinking Their Relationship
Abstract This article argues that the Qumran pesharim and TgJon originate from a common, though internally varied, elite intellectual tradition with a priestly character. This tradition developed particular interests, e.g. messianism and eschatology, and transmitted individual textual and interpreta...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2021
|
| Dans: |
Aramaic studies
Année: 2021, Volume: 19, Numéro: 1, Pages: 25-40 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Targum Jonathan
/ Pescher
/ Dead Sea scrolls, Manuscrits de la Mer Morte
/ Prêtre
/ Eschatologie
/ Messianisme
|
| RelBib Classification: | BH Judaïsme HB Ancien Testament |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
ancient Jewish textual scholarship
B Messianism B Qumran pesher B Priests B Eschatology B Targum Jonathan |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Abstract This article argues that the Qumran pesharim and TgJon originate from a common, though internally varied, elite intellectual tradition with a priestly character. This tradition developed particular interests, e.g. messianism and eschatology, and transmitted individual textual and interpretative traditions. As it appears, this tradition has pre-70 CE roots, but continued after the destruction of the temple. Both the Qumran commentaries and TgJon reflect the interests of this priestly tradition and incorporate some of its textual and exegetical traditions, though not through literary dependence. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5227 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Aramaic studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455227-bja10017 |