Religious Duress and Reverential Fear in Clergy Sexual Abuse Cases: Examination of Victims’ Reports and Recommendations for Change

According to prior research, approximately 14% of sexual victimizations by priests are reported to civil authorities. Victim grooming by the abuser is a main reason the number of reported incidents is low. The concept of reverential fear and religious duress is related to grooming, but very little e...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Spraitz, Jason D. (Auteur) ; Bowen, Kendra N. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sage 2021
Dans: Criminal justice policy review
Année: 2021, Volume: 32, Numéro: 5, Pages: 484-500
Sujets non-standardisés:B sexual grooming
B reverential fear
B Clergy Sexual Abuse
B Catholic Church
B religious duress
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:According to prior research, approximately 14% of sexual victimizations by priests are reported to civil authorities. Victim grooming by the abuser is a main reason the number of reported incidents is low. The concept of reverential fear and religious duress is related to grooming, but very little empirical research focuses on the concept. Reverential fear and religious duress is a type of fear that limits the ability of clergy sexual abuse victims to disengage from their abuser; it intensifies when one has reverence and respect for the clergyman who abused them. In this article, available data from personnel files from several Catholic institutions are analyzed to gain a deeper understanding of reverential fear and religious duress. Findings suggest victims of clergy sexual abuse experience reverential fear and religious duress. The discussion focuses on why victims remain silent and provides recommendations for new policy and for improving existing policy.
ISSN:1552-3586
Contient:Enthalten in: Criminal justice policy review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0887403420921232