Time, Power, and Religion: Comparing the Disputes over Temple Mount and the Ayodhya Sacred Sites

Abstract The main argument of this paper is that the sacred time and space of the nation has displaced the meaning of sacredness of the religious sites, and legitimized the national community. By comparing the Temple Mount and Ayodhya disputes, the paper exposes the tensions between two polarities,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Cesari, Jocelyne 1962- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Brill 2021
In: Journal of law, religion and state
Jahr: 2021, Band: 9, Heft: 1, Seiten: 95-123
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Tempelberg (Jerusalem) / Interreligiosität / Babur-Moschee Ayodhya / Streit / Staatsgewalt
RelBib Classification:AD Religionssoziologie; Religionspolitik
AX Interreligiöse Beziehungen
KBL Naher Osten; Nordafrika
KBM Asien
ZC Politik
weitere Schlagwörter:B Nation
B Genealogy
B religious vs. political
B State
B sacred vs profane
B Secularism
B Community
Online Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (Verlag)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract The main argument of this paper is that the sacred time and space of the nation has displaced the meaning of sacredness of the religious sites, and legitimized the national community. By comparing the Temple Mount and Ayodhya disputes, the paper exposes the tensions between two polarities, sacred/profane and religious/political, which helps explain the influence of national identities on the contested sacredness of religious sites. The competition over the Temple Mount is nested within a “thicker” context of conflicting political claims over Jerusalem and national territory between Jewish groups on one hand and between Jews and Muslims on the other. The Ayodhya disagreement is related to the political tensions between the dominant and the minority religions, which have turned the religious dispute over a holy site into a debate on the sacredness of the national community.
ISSN:2212-4810
Enthält:Enthalten in: Journal of law, religion and state
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22124810-00803003