“Page after Page I Thought, That’s the Way It Is”: Academic Knowledge and the Making of the ‘Islam Debate’ in the Netherlands
Abstract In this ‘Current Debate’ article, we discuss the entanglement of academic discourse and public debates on Islam and Muslims in the Netherlands. Academic output is a crucial but complex constituent of that debate. Many academics write policy reports, or take part in the debate through the me...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2021
|
| Dans: |
Journal of Muslims in Europe
Année: 2021, Volume: 10, Numéro: 1, Pages: 85-112 |
| RelBib Classification: | AX Dialogue interreligieux BJ Islam KBD Benelux ZC Politique en général |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
The Netherlands
B regimes of knowledge B policy principles B Counterpublics B Muslim question |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Abstract In this ‘Current Debate’ article, we discuss the entanglement of academic discourse and public debates on Islam and Muslims in the Netherlands. Academic output is a crucial but complex constituent of that debate. Many academics write policy reports, or take part in the debate through the media, and, whether they like it or not, their regular work is often co-opted by one of the discursive communities that take part in the debate. Research on Islam and Muslims is thus entangled with predominating knowledge regimes and policy priorities. We discuss several Dutch publications of the last three decades, and three recent books in particular, in order to show this entanglement. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2211-7954 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of Muslims in Europe
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22117954-BJA10019 |