Biblical Interpretation and Kyriarchal Globalization
Feminist biblical studieaas engage both wo/men and gender studies for their work, but the feminist analysis is not identical with and cannot be limited to gender studies. Rather, feminist biblical studies needs to focus on issues of power and structures of domination in light of wo/men’s struggles a...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
| Dans: |
The Oxford handbook of feminist approaches to the Hebrew Bible
Année: 2020 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Réception <scientifique>
/ Histoire
/ Juana Inés, de la Cruz 1651-1695
/ Ramabai, Pandita 1858-1922
/ Ursula, de Jesús 1604-1666
/ Stanton, Elizabeth Cady 1815-1902
/ Stanton, Elizabeth Cady 1815-1902, Woman's Bible
/ Ṭiḳṭiner, Rivḳah -1550
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions HA Bible |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
protofeminism
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Feminist biblical studieaas engage both wo/men and gender studies for their work, but the feminist analysis is not identical with and cannot be limited to gender studies. Rather, feminist biblical studies needs to focus on issues of power and structures of domination in light of wo/men’s struggles against kyriarchal relations. Accordingly, feminist biblical studies are social-cultural-political studies of domination, exploring how the Bible and biblical interpretation function and are shaped in the context of global kyriarchal neoliberalism. If the analytic object of feminist theory and biblical studies is not simply woman or gender in the Bible but the intersectionality of domination—of kyriarchy (from the Greek kyrios for “lord, master, legal guardian” and archein for “to rule, dominate”), the object needs to be understood in terms of the ontology of kyriarchal power. Kyriarchal relations of domination are characteristic of the ancient biblical worlds and are still at work today in the multiplicative intersectionalities of class, race, gender, ethnicity, empire, and other structures of exploitation. Hence, biblical interpretation must not only be practiced in terms of its content but also in terms of its function in global neo-liberalism, which is not only a theory of market relations but also a theory of human relations. We are encouraged to think not only of our work but also of our lives in economic terms in global neoliberal societies. These societies are characterized by xenophobic reactions against displaced populations and strangers, the threat of global warming, political polarization, unemployment, poverty, and centuries of exploitation, as well as by the devaluation of societal equality and democratic multiplicity. |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 0190462698 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: The Oxford handbook of feminist approaches to the Hebrew Bible
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190462673.013.1 |