Weapon of the strong?: government support for religion and majoritarian terrorism

This article addresses a puzzle in terrorism studies. That terrorism functions as a “weapon of the weak” is conventional wisdom among terrorism researchers. When it comes to religious communities, however, often it is those groups favored by the state—rather than repressed minority communities—that...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Henne, Peter S. (Author) ; Saiya, Nilay ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author) ; Hand, Ashlyn W. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publications 2020
In: The journal of conflict resolution
Year: 2020, Volume: 64, Issue: 10, Pages: 1943-1967
Further subjects:B Militancy
B Terrorism
B Islam
B Cause
B Dschihadismus
B Religion
B Radicalization
B Politics
B Majority
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This article addresses a puzzle in terrorism studies. That terrorism functions as a “weapon of the weak” is conventional wisdom among terrorism researchers. When it comes to religious communities, however, often it is those groups favored by the state—rather than repressed minority communities—that commit acts of terrorism. We argue that this is because official religious favoritism can empower and radicalize majority communities, leading them to commit more and more destructive terrorist attacks. We test this claim using a statistical analysis of Muslim-majority countries. Our findings support the idea that the combination of state support of religion and discrimination against minorities encourages terrorism from majority religious groups.
Item Description:Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 1962-1967
ISSN:1552-8766
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of conflict resolution
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0022002720916854