Worldviews: overarching concept, discrete body of knowledge or paradigmatic tool?

The term ‘worldviews’ is employed across disciplinary boundaries, yet with no agreed definition it may actually obscure rather than clarify meaning. The use of the term has grown in frequency, particularly in Religious Education (RE) in England, since the Commission on RE’s final report (2018), whic...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Flanagan, Ruth (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer [2020]
In: Journal of Religious Education
Year: 2020, Volume: 68, Issue: 3, Pages: 331-344
RelBib Classification:AH Religious education
KBF British Isles
Further subjects:B Worldviews
B Teachers
B Religious Education
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1737543885
003 DE-627
005 20240407193417.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201102s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s40839-020-00113-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1737543885 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1737543885 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Flanagan, Ruth  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Flanagan, Ruth 
245 1 0 |a Worldviews  |b overarching concept, discrete body of knowledge or paradigmatic tool? 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The term ‘worldviews’ is employed across disciplinary boundaries, yet with no agreed definition it may actually obscure rather than clarify meaning. The use of the term has grown in frequency, particularly in Religious Education (RE) in England, since the Commission on RE’s final report (2018), which recommended changing the name of RE to ‘Religion and worldviews’. Response to the report has been mixed. Some fear that an introduction of worldviews may lead to a dilution of RE and overburden an already overstretched teaching profession; others welcome a meaningful study of non-religious worldviews which they view as more pertinent in the current growth of ‘nones’ (Nones’ term used for those who adhere to ‘no faith’, see Woodhead (J Br Acad 4:245-261, 2016)) in England. Teaching worldviews raises questions of selection: are all worldviews equally appropriate for pupils to study and consistent with the aims of education? For example, is it appropriate for a 6 year old to study Hedonism or National Socialism? This paper problematizes the binary nature of the debate and interrogates the usage of the term 'worldviews'. Focusing on ‘institutional worldviews’ is questionable as the role of master narratives, embedded in these, lose currency. The ‘disintegration of master narratives’, (Riessman in Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2008, p. 17), has led to a rise in individuals creating their personal embodied worldviews, albeit subconsciously. Rather than consider worldviews as a discrete body of knowledge that imposes on an already overburdened curriculum, I propose that employing worldviews as an overarching concept, providing a type of paradigmatic analysis for RE, may lead to a greater and more profound understanding of religion(s). 
601 |a Knowledge 
650 4 |a Religious Education 
650 4 |a Teachers 
650 4 |a Worldviews 
652 |a AH:KBF 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Religious Education  |d Singapore : Springer, 2014  |g 68(2020), 3, Seite 331-344  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)815914490  |w (DE-600)2806653-4  |w (DE-576)425059901  |x 2199-4625  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:68  |g year:2020  |g number:3  |g pages:331-344 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40839-020-00113-7.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00113-7  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 379091486X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1737543885 
LOK |0 005 20220307112040 
LOK |0 008 201102||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044888  |a KBF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550364804  |a AH 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL