Does Human Soul Have an Owner?: Patristic Anthropology and Wittgenstein on the Human Identity
In the mainstream anthropology of Byzantine patristics, the human “I” is twice inconsistent, being identical to but different from a “part of God” and, in the created world, being not a something while without being a nothing. The latter kind of inconsistency was described as well by Ludwig Wittgens...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
| In: |
Scrinium
Year: 2020, Volume: 16, Issue: 1, Pages: 30-47 |
| RelBib Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBE Anthropology TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Free Will
B patristic anthropology B Gregory of Nazianzus B Subject B Wittgenstein |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | In the mainstream anthropology of Byzantine patristics, the human “I” is twice inconsistent, being identical to but different from a “part of God” and, in the created world, being not a something while without being a nothing. The latter kind of inconsistency was described as well by Ludwig Wittgenstein in his peculiar doctrine of subjectivity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1817-7565 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Scrinium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18177565-00160A03 |