Science and Other Common Nouns: Further Implications of Anti-Essentialism

The term “science” is a common noun that is used to designate a whole range of activities. If Reeves is right—and I think he is—that there is no essence to these activities that allows them to be objectively identified and demarcated from nonscience, then what qualifies as science is determined by c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Stump, J. B. 1969- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
In: Zygon
Jahr: 2020, Band: 55, Heft: 3, Seiten: 782-791
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Reeves, Josh A. 1976-, Against methodology in science and religion / Naturwissenschaften / Religion / Essentialismus
RelBib Classification:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
CF Christentum und Wissenschaft
weitere Schlagwörter:B Essentialism
B Language
B Scientific Method
B Evolution
B History
B Pseudoscience
B Truth
Online Zugang: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The term “science” is a common noun that is used to designate a whole range of activities. If Reeves is right—and I think he is—that there is no essence to these activities that allows them to be objectively identified and demarcated from nonscience, then what qualifies as science is determined by communities. It becomes much more difficult on this antiessentialism position to identify and dismiss pseudo-science. I suggest we might find a way forward, though, by engaging a philosophical tradition that has largely been neglected in English-speaking science and religion studies, and by articulating a theory of consensus along the lines of Oreskes (2019).
ISSN:1467-9744
Enthält:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12622