The Theological Debate Over Human Enhancement: An Empirical Case Study of a Mediating Organization

For most theologians, theology should ultimately be used by the laity and/or the public. However, the religion and science debate has not focused on the divide between theologians and the laity. In this case study I examine the debate among theologians about human enhancement. I focus on the extent...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Evans, John Hyde 1965- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
Dans: Zygon
Année: 2020, Volume: 55, Numéro: 3, Pages: 615-637
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Théologie / Sciences de la nature / Amélioration humaine (Éthique médicale) / Débat / Médiation / Laïc
RelBib Classification:AA Sciences des religions
AB Philosophie de la religion
FA Théologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Human Enhancement
B Survey
B mediating organization
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:For most theologians, theology should ultimately be used by the laity and/or the public. However, the religion and science debate has not focused on the divide between theologians and the laity. In this case study I examine the debate among theologians about human enhancement. I focus on the extent to which the structure of the debate in a “mediating organization” between the theologians and the public coincides with the structure of the debate among the theologians. I conduct a survey of participants in the organization, and find that the basic divides among the theologians are largely replicated. These results, when combined with studies of the theologians themselves and the laity, provide a more holistic understanding of the future debate about human enhancement.
ISSN:1467-9744
Contient:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12619