Post-rational eco-communicological aporias, pre-rational eco-communicological euporias: the “magical worldview” and restoring a meaningful man-nature dialogue
This essay argues that contemporary Global Society’s biggest ‘communication challenge’ is to find ways to interface and dialogue meaningfully with its more-than-human Umwelt. It shows that communication strategies premised by the tenets of ‘constructivism’ and ‘realism’ do not work. Neither do ‘cons...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Fachgebiet für Religionswissenschaft im Fachbereich 11, Philipps Universität Marburg
[2020]
|
| In: |
Marburg journal of religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 22, Issue: 2, Pages: 1-35 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Human being
/ Environment
/ Biological systems
/ Communication strategy
/ Magical thinking
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AF Geography of religion AZ New religious movements NCG Environmental ethics; Creation ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
cosmonomy
B Ethology B magical B global society B incantatory magic B cosmodicy B Religion B archaic Hellenic B Enchantment B hieroglossia B environmental affordance B song culture |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | This essay argues that contemporary Global Society’s biggest ‘communication challenge’ is to find ways to interface and dialogue meaningfully with its more-than-human Umwelt. It shows that communication strategies premised by the tenets of ‘constructivism’ and ‘realism’ do not work. Neither do ‘consiliant’ syntheses of these two approaches. Instead, it suggests that a better solution lies in emulating the communication strategies associated with the ‘magical worldview’. Specifically, it focuses on (1) why magical rationalism assumed that Nature had a voice and a language (2) how the intelligence related by this language was made a foundation and an operational component of societal values and practices and, finally, (3) why there is nothing far-fetched about embracing this rationalism, factoring it into our ideas about ‘progress’ and operationalising it as a means to negotiate an entente cordiale between Nature and Global Society. This paper is one of a collection that originated in the IAHR Special Conference “Religions, Science and Technology in Cultural Contexts: Dynamics of Change”, held at The Norwegian University of Science and Technology on March 1-2, 2012. For an overall introduction see the article by Ulrika Mårtensson, also published here. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1612-2941 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Marburg journal of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.17192/mjr.2020.22.8296 |