Who speaks for nature? On the continued importance of the Bergson-Einstein debate
This article argues that efforts to understand the relationship of science and theology beyond the dichotomies of nature and culture might be aided by reconsidering the 20th c. debate between Henri Bergson and Albert Einstein. Rather than merely a contest over proper science or even the demarcation...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Routledge
[2020]
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Jahr: 2020, Band: 18, Heft: 1, Seiten: 137-151 |
| RelBib Classification: | CF Christentum und Wissenschaft KAH Kirchengeschichte 1648-1913; Neuzeit KAJ Kirchengeschichte 1914-; neueste Zeit VA Philosophie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Einstein
B Nature B Bergson B theology and science B Metaphysics B Time |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article argues that efforts to understand the relationship of science and theology beyond the dichotomies of nature and culture might be aided by reconsidering the 20th c. debate between Henri Bergson and Albert Einstein. Rather than merely a contest over proper science or even the demarcation of science and philosophy, I argue that the real issue in their debate was a question of continuing importance for the contemporary dialogue of science and theology, namely: what is the heart of nature, and who gets to speak for it? |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2019.1710354 |