Fundamental Problems and Methods in the Study of Religion: A Reply to My Critics
In this reply I engage with the response articles by Kocku von Stuckrad, Katja Rakow, Eric Venbrux, Arjan Sterken, and Kees de Groot. Noting where we agree, disagree, and seem to talk past each other, I clarify what I consider to be the subject matter and the fundamental problems and methods in the...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Beteiligte: | ; ; ; ; |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Amsterdam University Press
[2020]
|
| In: |
NTT
Jahr: 2020, Band: 74, Heft: 3, Seiten: 277-283 |
| RelBib Classification: | AA Religionswissenschaft |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Comparison
B Definition B research problems B study of religion |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | In this reply I engage with the response articles by Kocku von Stuckrad, Katja Rakow, Eric Venbrux, Arjan Sterken, and Kees de Groot. Noting where we agree, disagree, and seem to talk past each other, I clarify what I consider to be the subject matter and the fundamental problems and methods in the systematic study of religion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2590-3268 |
| Bezug: | Kritik von "Institutional Histories, Identity Work, and Critical Theory (2020)"
Kritik von "Of Bogeymen and The Promises of The Past or How to Construct a Uniform Identity (2020)" Kritik von "Religious Studies (2020)" Kritik von "Support for the Systematic Study of Religion (2020)" Kritik von "Flourishing Diversity (2020)" |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: NTT
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/NTT2020.3.008.ALTE |