Buddhism, Free Will, and Punishment: Taking Buddhist Ethics Seriously

In recent decades, there has been growing interest among philosophers in what the various Buddhist traditions have said, can say, and should say, in response to the traditional problem of free will. This article investigates the relationship between Buddhist philosophy and the historical problem of...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Caruso, Gregg D. 1972- (Auteur)
Collaborateurs: Repetti, Rick (Antécédent bibliographique)
Type de support: Électronique Review
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
Dans: Zygon
Année: 2020, Volume: 55, Numéro: 2, Pages: 474-496
Compte rendu de:Buddhism, meditation, and free will (Boca Raton, FL : Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis,, 2018) (Caruso, Gregg D.)
RelBib Classification:BL Bouddhisme
NCB Éthique individuelle
Sujets non-standardisés:B Punishment
B Ethics
B Free Will
B Buddhism
B Compte-rendu de lecture
B Reactive attitudes
B Moral Responsibility
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:In recent decades, there has been growing interest among philosophers in what the various Buddhist traditions have said, can say, and should say, in response to the traditional problem of free will. This article investigates the relationship between Buddhist philosophy and the historical problem of free will. It begins by critically examining Rick Repetti's Buddhism, Meditation, and Free Will (2019), in which he argues for a conception of “agentless agency” and defends a view he calls “Buddhist soft compatibilism.” It then turns to a more wide-ranging discussion of Buddhism and free will—one that foregrounds Buddhist ethics and takes seriously what the various Buddhist traditions have said about desert, punishment, and the reactive attitudes of resentment, indignation, and moral anger. The article aims to show that, not only is Buddhism best conceived as endorsing a kind of free will skepticism, Buddhist ethics can provide a helpful guide to living without basic desert moral responsibility and free will.
ISSN:1467-9744
Référence:Kommentar in "A Defense of Buddhism, Meditation, and Free Will (2020)"
Contient:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12599