Buddhism, Free Will, and Punishment: Taking Buddhist Ethics Seriously

In recent decades, there has been growing interest among philosophers in what the various Buddhist traditions have said, can say, and should say, in response to the traditional problem of free will. This article investigates the relationship between Buddhist philosophy and the historical problem of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Caruso, Gregg D. 1972- (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Repetti, Rick (VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks)
Medienart: Elektronisch Review
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
In: Zygon
Jahr: 2020, Band: 55, Heft: 2, Seiten: 474-496
Rezension von:Buddhism, meditation, and free will (Boca Raton, FL : Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis,, 2018) (Caruso, Gregg D.)
RelBib Classification:BL Buddhismus
NCB Individualethik
weitere Schlagwörter:B Punishment
B Ethics
B Free Will
B Rezension
B Buddhism
B Reactive attitudes
B Moral Responsibility
Online Zugang: Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In recent decades, there has been growing interest among philosophers in what the various Buddhist traditions have said, can say, and should say, in response to the traditional problem of free will. This article investigates the relationship between Buddhist philosophy and the historical problem of free will. It begins by critically examining Rick Repetti's Buddhism, Meditation, and Free Will (2019), in which he argues for a conception of “agentless agency” and defends a view he calls “Buddhist soft compatibilism.” It then turns to a more wide-ranging discussion of Buddhism and free will—one that foregrounds Buddhist ethics and takes seriously what the various Buddhist traditions have said about desert, punishment, and the reactive attitudes of resentment, indignation, and moral anger. The article aims to show that, not only is Buddhism best conceived as endorsing a kind of free will skepticism, Buddhist ethics can provide a helpful guide to living without basic desert moral responsibility and free will.
ISSN:1467-9744
Bezug:Kommentar in "A Defense of Buddhism, Meditation, and Free Will (2020)"
Enthält:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12599