Moral Decisions About Human Germ-Line Modification

Technologies for human germ-line modification may soon enable humanity to create new types of human beings. Decisions about use of this power entail an unprecedented combination of difficulties: the stakes are immense, the unknowns are daunting, and moral principles are called into question. Evolved...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Adams, Roger R. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
In: Zygon
Jahr: 2020, Band: 55, Heft: 2, Seiten: 430-443
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B CRISPR/Cas-Methode / Enhancement (Medizinische Ethik) / Entscheidung / Wissenschaftsethik
RelBib Classification:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
NCH Medizinische Ethik
NCJ Wissenschaftsethik
VA Philosophie
weitere Schlagwörter:B Religion and science
B CRISPR
B Morality
B Evolution
B Genetics
Online Zugang: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Technologies for human germ-line modification may soon enable humanity to create new types of human beings. Decisions about use of this power entail an unprecedented combination of difficulties: the stakes are immense, the unknowns are daunting, and moral principles are called into question. Evolved morality is not a sure basis for these decisions, both because of its inherent imperfections and because genetic engineering could eventually change humans’ innate cognitive mechanisms. Nevertheless, consensus is needed on moral values relevant to germ-line modification. These values could be based on characteristics of human beings that would remain constant regardless of revised genomes.
ISSN:1467-9744
Enthält:Enthalten in: Zygon
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/zygo.12592