Tillich and the Philosophy of the Subject
This article underlines the value of the philosophy of the subject. Its value is contested, both in itself and related to Paul Tillich. In Dutch theology, the philosophy of the subject was never well received, which seems disadvantageous to the study of Tillich. The present article first points out...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Review |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Amsterdam University Press
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
NTT
Année: 2020, Volume: 74, Numéro: 2, Pages: 139-148 |
| Compte rendu de: | Offenbarung, absolute Wahrheit und interreligiöser Dialog (Berlin : De Gruyter, 2019) (Benjamins, Hendrik S.)
|
| RelBib Classification: | AE Psychologie de la religion KAJ Époque contemporaine KDD Église protestante NBE Anthropologie VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Postmodernism
B interpretation of life B Compte-rendu de lecture B Paul Tillich B subject philosophy |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This article underlines the value of the philosophy of the subject. Its value is contested, both in itself and related to Paul Tillich. In Dutch theology, the philosophy of the subject was never well received, which seems disadvantageous to the study of Tillich. The present article first points out some fundamental questions concerning the subject in recent thought, next describes the approach to the subject from a subject-philosophical point of view, and finally underlines that the subject is a matter of concern for theology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2590-3268 |
| Référence: | Kritik in "Reply to Henk van den Belts and Rick Benjamins articles (2020)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: NTT
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/NTT2020.2.004.BENJ |