De diepte van Pniël: het existentiële karakter van gelovig omgaan met de Bijbel

In this essay the author of the book Lezen en laten lezen (Reading and being read) responds to the other essays in this issue, maintaining his thesis that receptivity and the change of subject (God becoming the subject) are crucial for living with the Bible. The author affirms Eep Talstra’s call for...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Huijgen, Arnold 1978- (Author)
Contributors: Talstra, Eep 1946- (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Wilde, M. K. de (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Vlastuin, W. van 1963- (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Burger, Hans 1974- (Bibliographic antecedent) ; Belt, Henk van den 1971- (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:Dutch
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [2020]
In: Theologia reformata
Year: 2020, Volume: 63, Issue: 2, Pages: 176-185
RelBib Classification:HA Bible
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:In this essay the author of the book Lezen en laten lezen (Reading and being read) responds to the other essays in this issue, maintaining his thesis that receptivity and the change of subject (God becoming the subject) are crucial for living with the Bible. The author affirms Eep Talstra’s call for exegetical methods as legitimate approaches of Scripture, but denies that a doctrine of inerrancy is needed (against Marco de Wilde). His discussion with Wim van Vlastuin emphasizes the comprehensive character of existence without reducing existence to a relation. He affirms Hans Burger’s call for spiritual formation, but warns against neo-calvinist optimism. Finally, over against Henk van den Belt’s “rules of faith,” the author’s holds that a single rule of faith to read Scripture would refocus ecclesial, exegetical, and above all theological interpretation of Scripture.
ISSN:0040-5612
Reference:Kritik von "Is hermeneutiek nog ergens goed voor? (2020)"
Kritik von "'De Schrift kan niet gebroken worden' (2020)"
Kritik von "De Geest is geen scepticus; de hele Luther (2020)"
Kritik von "Handelen van God, historiciteit, heiliging (2020)"
Kritik von "Schriftuur, natuur en cultuur (2020)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Theologia reformata
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.21827/TR.63.2.176-185