Challenges in Digital Ethnography: Research Ethics Relating to the Securitisation of Islam
The article explores ethical challenges in digital media ethnography in the field of militant political Islam, pointing to the dilemma that arises in doing research on Islam as part of the securitised research funding system. Expanding on discussions in anthropology about the principles of “do no ha...
Auteurs: | ; |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill
[2020]
|
Dans: |
Journal of Muslims in Europe
Année: 2020, Volume: 9, Numéro: 2, Pages: 175-195 |
RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions BJ Islam ZB Sociologie ZC Politique en général |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
digital media ethnography
B Transparency B Anonymity B ethics and social media B militant political Islam B securitisation of research B public-private |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Résumé: | The article explores ethical challenges in digital media ethnography in the field of militant political Islam, pointing to the dilemma that arises in doing research on Islam as part of the securitised research funding system. Expanding on discussions in anthropology about the principles of “do no harm” and “be open and honest about your work”, the authors reflectively contextualise the interrelated notions of “Jihadism” and “Salafism” and examine how these categories serve as “floating signifiers”. Examining one particular incident from the digital fieldwork leads to discussions of transparency, anonymity and shifting forms of “publicness” in the digital sphere. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2211-7954 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of Muslims in Europe
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22117954-BJA10002 |