Does Religion Promote Trust?: The Role of Signaling, Reputation, and Punishment

Scholars of religion, including such luminaries as Durkheim, Rappaport, Turner, and Weber, have widely assumed that religion promotes intragroup trust among adherents. Recent applications of signaling theory to religious behavior among economists, cognitive scientists, and evolutionary anthropologis...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sosis, Richard (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [publisher not identified] [2005]
In: Interdisciplinary journal of research on religion
Year: 2005, Volume: 1, Pages: 1-30
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei registrierungspflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1696269873
003 DE-627
005 20210708121547.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200427s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1696269873 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1696269873 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sosis, Richard  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Does Religion Promote Trust?  |b The Role of Signaling, Reputation, and Punishment 
264 1 |c [2005] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Scholars of religion, including such luminaries as Durkheim, Rappaport, Turner, and Weber, have widely assumed that religion promotes intragroup trust among adherents. Recent applications of signaling theory to religious behavior among economists, cognitive scientists, and evolutionary anthropologists further endorse this assumption. However, trust has not been rigorously or consistently defined across authors, making generalizations difficult to evaluate. Here I follow Bacharach and Gambetta's (2001) behavioral definition of trust and show that the conditions for intragroup trust are often not met in religious communities, especially isolationist and closed communities to which high levels of trust are typically ascribed. Rather, in such communities, cooperation is maintained through institutional structures that effectively punish cheaters and enhance the value of an honest reputation. These groups gainfully facilitate collective action by offering a circumscribed social arena in which reputations can be built, evaluated, rewarded, and efficiently punished. While face-to-face reciprocal relations obviate the need for trusting behavior within closed religious communities, when social groups are fluid, religious practices and symbolic markers are successful in promoting trust among in-group members and anonymous coreligionists who reside in different communities. In addition, these religious badges of identity may be used by non-group members as signals of trustworthiness. 
601 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Interdisciplinary journal of research on religion  |d [S.l.] : [s.n.], 2005  |g Volume 1 (2005), Article 7, Seite 1-30  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)513216359  |w (DE-600)2238178-8  |w (DE-576)28131120X  |x 1556-3723  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2005  |g pages:1-30 
856 4 0 |u http://www.religjournal.com/articles/article_view.php?id=7  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei registrierungspflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 1  |j 2005  |h 1-30  |y Volume 1 (2005), Article 7, Seite 1-30 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3637265974 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1696269873 
LOK |0 005 20200427171813 
LOK |0 008 200427||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL