The Problem with Too Much Fidelity to the Modern Synthesis When Explaining the Origins and Evolution of the Social Universe
Religion emerged as a cognitive capacity and behavioral propensity by virtue of Darwinian natural selection on hominins and then humans to become more social and group oriented. The capacity to be religious is only a modest extension of the Darwinian selection on cognitive, emotional, and interperso...
| Autres titres: | Special Issue on Evolutionary Theories of Religion |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Equinox Publ.
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Année: 2016, Volume: 4, Numéro: 1, Pages: 81-90 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Évolution culturelle
/ Sociologie des religions
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions AE Psychologie de la religion |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | Religion emerged as a cognitive capacity and behavioral propensity by virtue of Darwinian natural selection on hominins and then humans to become more social and group oriented. The capacity to be religious is only a modest extension of the Darwinian selection on cognitive, emotional, and interpersonal propensities of all great apes and, hence, early hominins. However, other forms of natural selection need to be added to the explanation of why religion became institutionalized in early human societies, why religious organizations arise and die from competition, and why violence is so often a part of religious revolution. These additional types of natural selection do not obviate Darwinian selection on the human brain, but they become a necessary supplement to Darwinian analysis if the early institutionalization and subsequent evolution of religion are to be more fully explained. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2049-7563 |
| Référence: | Kommentar zu "The Trouble with "Evolution of Religion" (2016)"
Kommentar zu "Why the Evolutionary Sociology of Religion Should Build on Rather than Reinvent Biological Models (2016)" Kommentar zu "Religion, Neurosociology and Evolutionary Sociology (2016)" Kommentar zu "Turner's Definition and Explanation of Religion (2016)" Kommentar zu "Human Nature and the Sociology of Religion (2016)" Kommentar zu "Explaining Religion(s) with Deep Historical Time Scales (2016)" Kommentar zu "What Is the Relationship of Spencerian, Durkheimian and Marxian Natural Selections to Darwinian Natural Selection and How Can We Formalize Their Mutual Interaction? (2016)" Kommentar zu "Understanding the Evolution of Religion (2016)" |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1558/jcsr.35730 |