The scarlet letter of "post-truth": the sunset boulevard of communication
In this paper post-truth mechanisms in discourse are taken into account and the attempt is made to understand how language is used in communication characterized by post-truth. A brief description of the word post-truth is given, together with some etymological notes which can shed light on how trut...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Taylor & Francis
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Church, Communication and Culture
Année: 2019, Volume: 4, Numéro: 3, Pages: 287-304 |
| RelBib Classification: | NBE Anthropologie VB Herméneutique; philosophie ZA Sciences sociales ZC Politique en général |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
argumentative roles
B Common Ground B Framing B Metaphor B Communicative event B Community |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | In this paper post-truth mechanisms in discourse are taken into account and the attempt is made to understand how language is used in communication characterized by post-truth. A brief description of the word post-truth is given, together with some etymological notes which can shed light on how truth is conceptualized in various languages. The meaning of post-truth and its denotation are then discussed, and it is shown that people involved in communication about post-truth as well as in post-truth messages do not rely on personal common ground, which requires a serious ontological commitment and genuine interpersonal relations. Without such a commitment no communication can be taken seriously and only ideological constructs with poor relevance for human life are left. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2375-3242 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Church, Communication and Culture
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/23753234.2019.1665468 |