Pacifying Muslims in Germany's City of Peace': interreligious dialogue as a tool of governance in Osnabrück
Addressing Muslims as a target group in municipal politics is a relatively new development in German cities. Interreligious dialogue, often initiated by established Christian actors, provides a format for doing so. In our local West German case study, the politics of dialogue link up with a historic...
| Auteurs: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Religion, state & society
Année: 2019, Volume: 47, Numéro: 4/5, Pages: 440-455 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Osnabrück
/ Musulman
/ Dialogue interreligieux
/ Gouvernance
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions AX Dialogue interreligieux BJ Islam KBB Espace germanophone |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Muslims
B Islam B second generation B German city B Gouvernance B Interreligious Dialogue |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | Addressing Muslims as a target group in municipal politics is a relatively new development in German cities. Interreligious dialogue, often initiated by established Christian actors, provides a format for doing so. In our local West German case study, the politics of dialogue link up with a historical narrative of Osnabrück as City of Peace', creating a semantic framework which is hard to resist, yet not undisputed. As a governance tool, interreligious dialogue has the potential to pacify and to structure social relations. It tends to prefer and support certain subject positions, while neglecting others. In this contribution we focus both on actors who are involved in local interreligious dialogue as well as those who - for diverse reasons - do not participate, and who question or oppose it. Thus, we analyse the effects of interreligious dialogue on local subjectivation processes, including alternative reactions that might challenge the dominant paradigm. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1465-3974 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religion, state & society
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2019.1678976 |