Doxastic Involuntarism and Evidentialism: A Curious Modern Conjunction

It is a curious feature of early modern (specifically empiricist) epistemology and its contemporary heirs in analytic philosophy that belief is held both to be involuntary (doxastic involuntarism), and to be subject to a prescriptive norm of evidence (evidentialism). I begin by laying out these thes...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Gamache, Joseph (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: [2017]
Dans: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Année: 2017, Volume: 91, Pages: 81-92
RelBib Classification:CB Spiritualité chrétienne
KAE Moyen Âge central
KAJ Époque contemporaine
VA Philosophie
Sujets non-standardisés:B BELIEF & doubt
B EVIDENTIALISM
B analytic philosophy
B Faith
B theory of knowledge
Accès en ligne: Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:It is a curious feature of early modern (specifically empiricist) epistemology and its contemporary heirs in analytic philosophy that belief is held both to be involuntary (doxastic involuntarism), and to be subject to a prescriptive norm of evidence (evidentialism). I begin by laying out these theses, pointing out the tension that exists between them, as well as discussing how they put pressure on religious faith. I then ask why the first thesis—doxastic involuntarism—has come to be so dominant. Following my diagnosis, I advance reasons to think that the thin concept of belief presupposed by doxastic involuntarism is not faithful to our ordinary and more substantial concept of belief. I conclude by outlining an alternative understanding of what it means to believe that p, based on insights of St. Thomas Aquinas and Gabriel Marcel regarding belief and opinion, as well as the relationship between persons and their beliefs.
ISSN:2153-7925
Contient:Enthalten in: American Catholic Philosophical Association, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/acpaproc201982883