Reason with Baggage
In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewi...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Journal of religious ethics
Année: 2019, Volume: 47, Numéro: 4, Pages: 696-715 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Novak, David 1941-
/ Judaïsme
/ Droit naturel
/ Christianisme
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion BH Judaïsme CC Christianisme et religions non-chrétiennes; relations interreligieuses |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
David Novak
B Theology B Jewish-Christian dialogue B Natural Law B Metaphysics |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | In this article I show that David Novak's natural law theory precedes his encounter with Judaism. That is to say, the theory is the product of a theological viewpoint consisting of three components—createdness, commandedness, and response—that is then found by Novak in a number of areas of Jewish thought and practice that admit of the same three parts. As a result of this interpretation, I posit that Paul Nahme, who argues for a pragmatic reading of Novak's theory, as well as Martin Kavka and Randi Rashkover, who offer a political understanding of it, do not account for the theological richness and metaphysical basis of Novak's natural law theology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12287 |