La "Disputatio adversus Iudaeos" d'Anastase le Sinaïte: Authenticité du texte et identification des fragments
In his recent monograph on Anastasius of Sinai K.-H. Uthemann concludes that the recently edited Hexaemeron and the collection A of Edifying Tales attributed to Anastasius were not written by Anastasius, and the same also applies for the dialexis against the Jews mentioned in the Hexaemeron. By cont...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
[2019]
|
| In: |
Ephemerides theologicae Lovanienses
Year: 2019, Volume: 95, Issue: 3, Pages: 427-438 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Anastasios, Sinaites, Heiliger 610-701
/ Fragment
/ Jews
/ Authenticity
|
| RelBib Classification: | BH Judaism CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations KAD Church history 500-900; early Middle Ages |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | In his recent monograph on Anastasius of Sinai K.-H. Uthemann concludes that the recently edited Hexaemeron and the collection A of Edifying Tales attributed to Anastasius were not written by Anastasius, and the same also applies for the dialexis against the Jews mentioned in the Hexaemeron. By contrast, an analysis of the most current topics in these writings, as well as in other collections of Edifying Tales and in the Erotapokriseis, proves that these texts are authentic, as they show the same obsession with the oppression of Christians by Muslims and Jews. The dialexis against the Jews referred to in the Hexaemeron should therefore rather be connected with the work by the same title that is found in PG and considered to be authentic by K.-H. Uthemann. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1783-1423 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Ephemerides theologicae Lovanienses
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/ETL.95.3.3286795 |