Ḥazzan and Qahal: responsive chant in Minhag Ashkenaz

Ḥazzanut is frequently perceived as implying the elaborate performance of the ḥazzan to a passive congregation. However, such an assertion is largely untrue for Oriental and Sephardic Jews. Nor is this description representative of the Ashkenazi synagogue in earlier centuries. From minhag books, sid...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Goldberg, Geoffrey (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: College 1990
In: Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion
Year: 1990, Volume: 61, Pages: 203-217
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Ashkenazim / Judaism / Custom / Liturgical singing
RelBib Classification:BH Judaism
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:Ḥazzanut is frequently perceived as implying the elaborate performance of the ḥazzan to a passive congregation. However, such an assertion is largely untrue for Oriental and Sephardic Jews. Nor is this description representative of the Ashkenazi synagogue in earlier centuries. From minhag books, siddurim and maḥzorim there is considerable evidence that in Minhag Ashkenaz, the liturgical rite of southwest and south Germany, the responsive form, resulting in an interaction between ḥazzan and congregation, was a significant element of synagogue worship. Even after the rise of virtuoso ḥazzanut in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, the responsive form, contrary to the pattern in Eastern Europe, continued in many German communities. This would strongly suggest continuity with Oriental Jewish practice, in form, if not in actual musical content.
ISSN:0360-9049
Contains:Enthalten in: Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion