On the medieval rabbinic assumption that the early sages knew the peshat

Medieval peshat commentary constitutes a new stage in the history of Jewish biblical exegesis. Despite many points of continuity, it is customary in academic research to distinguish this approach from those of previous periods. The essential difference between these eras lies in the use of the pesha...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ṿizel, ʿEran 1972- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Liverpool University Press [2019]
In: Journal of Jewish studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 70, Issue: 2, Pages: 256-275
RelBib Classification:BH Judaism
HB Old Testament
KAC Church history 500-1500; Middle Ages
Further subjects:B Methodology
B MEDIEVAL scholars
B PESHAT (Jewish hermeneutics)
B Bible. Old Testament
B Education Research
Online Access: Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 167949354X
003 DE-627
005 20240409142636.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 191023s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.18647/3417/JJS-2019  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)167949354X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP167949354X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1065824173  |0 (DE-627)816836914  |0 (DE-576)327959819  |4 aut  |a Ṿizel, ʿEran  |d 1972- 
109 |a Ṿizel, ʿEran 1972-  |a Viezel, Eran 1972-  |a Ṿaizel, ʻEran 1972- 
245 1 0 |a On the medieval rabbinic assumption that the early sages knew the peshat  |c Eran Viezel 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Medieval peshat commentary constitutes a new stage in the history of Jewish biblical exegesis. Despite many points of continuity, it is customary in academic research to distinguish this approach from those of previous periods. The essential difference between these eras lies in the use of the peshat method, specifically the commentator's awareness of its methodological principles and commitment to them. It is therefore interesting that medieval scholars, including the peshat commentators themselves, casually assumed that peshat exegesis had been known from time immemorial and that even the rabbinic sages had been aware of its principles. From their perspective, the difference between them and the sages was merely a matter of choice: the sages, for a variety of reasons, paid scant attention to peshat exegesis, while they themselves devoted considerable attention to it. However, in their eyes, the peshat methodology and its principles were not in themselves innovative. I will present this view of the medieval scholars and try to explain its origins and rationale. 
650 4 |a Bible. Old Testament 
650 4 |a Education Research 
650 4 |a MEDIEVAL scholars 
650 4 |a Methodology 
650 4 |a PESHAT (Jewish hermeneutics) 
652 |a BH:HB:KAC 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of Jewish studies  |d Liverpool : Liverpool University Press, 1948  |g 70(2019), 2, Seite 256-275  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341338915  |w (DE-600)2066597-0  |w (DE-576)267942427  |x 2056-6689  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:70  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:256-275 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.18647/3417/JJS-2019  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3526454213 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 167949354X 
LOK |0 005 20200904083953 
LOK |0 008 191023||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044128  |a HB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043520  |a BH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044330  |a KAC 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a BIB  |a REL