Heterodox Economics, Social Ethics, and Inequalities

Research in the cognitive sciences indicates that metaphors significantly shape perceptions and approaches to problem solving. With this in mind, this essay argues that it is problematic for ethicists that mainstream economics and other social scientific literature relies on naturalistic metaphors t...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: McRorie, Christina (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
Dans: Journal of religious ethics
Année: 2019, Volume: 47, Numéro: 2, Pages: 232-258
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Orthodoxie et hétérodoxie en économie / Économie / Dissemblance / Éthique sociale
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
NCB Éthique individuelle
NCC Éthique sociale
NCE Éthique des affaires
Sujets non-standardisés:B Economics
B feminist economics
B Political Economy
B Markets
B Thomas Piketty
B Behavioral economics
B Metaphor
B heterodox economics
B Inequality
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:Research in the cognitive sciences indicates that metaphors significantly shape perceptions and approaches to problem solving. With this in mind, this essay argues that it is problematic for ethicists that mainstream economics and other social scientific literature relies on naturalistic metaphors to describe markets. These imply an inaccurate picture of economic phenomena and rhetorically frame many solutions to problems such as inequality as interventionist. This essay proposes that religious ethicists may find resources for avoiding this conceptual hazard in emerging fields of heterodox economics that are attentive to the role of culture and human agency in shaping markets. It introduces feminist, behavioral, institutional, and Austrian economics in particular and highlights some of the specific approaches to inequality adopted in these fields. It then suggests that engaging heterodox perspectives more generally may help ethicists keep in view the full complexity and social nature of the economic problems they analyze.
ISSN:1467-9795
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jore.12263