Is RELTRAD Still the Gold Standard?

The RELTRAD syntax remains the most influential operational method for assessing religious affiliations among respondents in major surveys. However, RELTRAD suffers from several key limitations. Consequently, a new coding scheme known as "Religious Identification" has emerged as an alterna...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shelton, Jason E. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2018]
In: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 57, Issue: 4, Pages: 817-826
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B USA / Denomination (Religion)
RelBib Classification:AA Study of religion
AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
Further subjects:B Measurement
B Black Church
B RELTRAD
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:The RELTRAD syntax remains the most influential operational method for assessing religious affiliations among respondents in major surveys. However, RELTRAD suffers from several key limitations. Consequently, a new coding scheme known as "Religious Identification" has emerged as an alternative. The goal of this article is to determine whether one of these disparate techniques yields more insightful results that further our knowledge of the dynamics of American religion. Findings from the 1984-2016 General Social Survey indicate that RELTRAD offers more precise statistical estimates when analyzing various religious sensibilities and religious-related social attitudes. This is due to several factors, most notable is RELTRAD's recognition of distinctiveness within the African-American Protestant religion tradition.
ISSN:1468-5906
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12557