Religious Coping and Heart Transplantation: From Threat to Health

Previous research has established the existence of homogeneous religious coping profiles in cardiac-transplantation candidates labeled as the deferring/collaborators, self-directors, and the eclectic religious copers. However, their prospective impact on outcome has not yet been established. This pa...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Sears, Samuel F. (Author) ; Greene, Anthony F. (Author) ; Fauerbach, Peter (Author) ; Mills, Roger M. (Author) ; Rodrigue, James R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V. [1997]
In: Journal of religion and health
Year: 1997, Volume: 36, Issue: 4, Pages: 345-352
Further subjects:B General Health
B Physical Functioning
B Clinical Practice
B Heart Transplantation
B Mental Health
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Summary:Previous research has established the existence of homogeneous religious coping profiles in cardiac-transplantation candidates labeled as the deferring/collaborators, self-directors, and the eclectic religious copers. However, their prospective impact on outcome has not yet been established. This paper examines potential differences between pre-cardiac transplantation religious coping cluster groups on post-cardiac transplantation quality of life (physical functioning, mental health, and general health). Results indicated that the religious coping profiles of deferring/collaborators and self-directors had significantly better scores on mental health and general health than did the eclectics. Implications for religious-coping research and clinical practice are discussed.
ISSN:1573-6571
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1023/A:1027485226293